This essay has a total of 1189 words and 5 pages.
Rhetorical Analysis of Marck Antony's speech
Rhetoric is perhaps one of the oldest disciplinary regimes introduced on the human race. Rhetoric is the study of impressive writing or speaking as a means of communication or persuasion. In William Shakespeare's very famous play "The Tragedy of Julius Caesar" Marcus Brutus and Marck Antony, both Roman Senators at the time; give a speech at Julius Caesar's funeral. Both speakers introduce themselves to the crowd in their own unique way with the usage of prodigiously different rhetorical strategies, therefore arousing in the Roman crowd greatly distinct emotions and reactions. Antony's pathetic speech proofed to be the most effective. He was able to turn the easily swayed crowd against the "honorable" conspirators, and he was able to portray Caesar as a non-ambitious caring and truly honorable roman man. In order to accomplish all his objectives Antony used in his speech a combination of verbal irony, repetition, connotation, and imagery rhetorical devices while strongly appealing to the plebeians "pathos" emotions.
The rhetorical device Antony took hold of and made the central device throughout his persuasive argument was verbal irony. The use of verbal irony in his speech is so strong that it borders on sarcasm. "Friends, Romans, countrymen,... I come to bury Ceasar, not to praise him." (Act III sc II 80-84) says Antony when introducing himself to the crowd. Knowingly that at that point Brutus was to them an "honorable" man he makes sure that he does not allow his emotions to take in and destroy his real intentions. He addresses the plebeians as "Friends" with the purpose of persuading them into believing that they were equal, and that he just wanted to say farewell to his passed, and dear friend Caesar. As his speech develops, Antony begins to plant the seed of doubt and anger in the plebeians’ hearts towards the conspirators. "The noble Brutus hath told you Caesar was ambitious...It was a grievous fault, And grievously hath Caesar answered it, ... they all are honorable men" (Act III sc II 84-91) Here very wisely Antony is telling the plebeians that Brutus's is an honorable, and noble man thus may excuses his wrongful act when killing Caesar. These contradicting statements "Brutus an honorable man/killing Caesar was wrongful," already begin to create confusion and distrust about the conspirators. Once he had aroused this feeling of doubt in the plebeians Antony was able to continue with his argument with much more strength and confidence. A point extremely important in Antony's eulogy was persuading the crowd to view Caesar as the most honorable man in Rome, whom was not ambitious as claimed by the conspirators. The evidence that Antony gave the crowd which persuaded them into believing that Ceasar was not indeed ambitious ,was that "He hath brought many captives home to Rome, whose ransoms did the general coffers fill...a kingly crown...he did thrice refuse...Brutus is an honorable man" (Act III sc II 95-116) Here Antony is implying to the crowd that if Caesar would've been ambitious as the honorable Brutus claims than Caesar would’ve kept all the treasures acquired at war for himself, plus he would’ve never rejected the crown offered to him three times.
Antony's plans were working to maximum excellency. The crowd was torn, angry, and believing each and every word the noble Antony spoke. To make his speech even more effective Antony emphasizes on a mixture of repetition and connotations, which makes of his speech even more pathetically appealing. A word that is extremely st
Read essay without registering
Donate an essay now and get the full essay emailed you