Death Penalty



what do canadates think?

Al Gore
Al Gore on Crime : Sep 4, 2000
Use DNA techniques to make death penalty more fair

I believe the death penalty is an appropriate and effective punishment for certain offenses. I strongly support, however, the use of new DNA techniques that can make our criminal justice system fairer
and more accurate. I believe that we must take every possible precaution to ensure the integrity and fairness of the system when we apply this ultimate penalty. We must be vigilant in not allowing race,
class or absence of competent counsel to have any influence in such crucial decisions.“
Source: Associated Press

Source: Associated Press
Al Gore on Crime : Feb 21, 2000
Three Strikes should apply only to truly violent crimes

GORE: [Regarding race-biased sentencing], the disparities between crack & powder cocaine are not justified by the scientific evidence. The practices of many law-enforcement agencies need to be
changed.
BRADLEY: The issue of the criminal justice system is deeper than simply the death penalty. There is unequal justice in this country, not only racial profiling, not only
crack cocaine, but also in terms of kids getting mandatory sentences for first-time non-violent drug use and being put away 20 years. That should not happen.
GORE: We should review of the kinds of penalty that are calculated under the [policy of] “three strikes and you’re out.” The focus ought to be on truly violent crime. We
need to continue reducing the crime rate, and community policing is a good strategy. But we also need more prevention.
BRADLEY. This is a deeper moral issue for the country. We have to stop denying the plight of black Americans and the indignities that they’re experiencing.
Source: (X-ref to Bradley) Democrat debate in Harlem, NYC

Al Gore on Crime : Feb 21, 2000
Supports death penalty; no moratorium for new DNA techniques

Q: What about a moratorium on the death penalty based on new DNA evidence that has released numerous minority convicts?
A: I strongly support the inquiry under way right now in the US Justice Department to see whether or not the racial disparity on the surface of the data justifies action of a kind that they’re now
exploring. I do support the death penalty, but I do not support a moratorium at this time. This inquiry in the Justice Department should be pursued.
Source: Democrat debate in Harlem, NYC
Source: Socialist Party Platform

Al Gore on Crime : May 16, 1999
Death penalty for murdering federal officers

Al Gore has also worked for new measures to protect our men and women in blue - such as help in purchasing life-saving bullet-proof vests, and an expansion of the death penalty for drug kingpins,
murderers of federal law enforcement officers, and nearly 60 additional kinds of violent felons.
Source: www.AlGore2000.com/issues/crime.html 5/16/99

Ralph Nader
Ralph Nader on Crime : Aug 9, 2000
Moratorium on executions

Q: What impact could a president have on the death penalty?
A: First of all, moral leadership [via] the bully pulpit. And second, there are now increasing numbers of federal crimes that provide for the death penalty right under the
jurisdiction of the president.
Q: What would be your message to Bush about the double execution expected tonight?
A: Well, if I was Bush I would be pretty ashamed. I would do what Governor Ryan did in Illinois, and declare a moratorium, or urge a moratorium in Texas, in order to
determine how many defendants have been adequately represented by competent lawyers, and to review the whole process by which those who get executed in Texas
are overwhelmingly minorities. And crimes are committed by all segments of society, and I would hope that George Bush will wake up to it because it is going to haunt
him for the next few weeks, there are going to be all these executions coming. There is one now involving a retarded man.
Source: CNN: “Burden of Proof”

Ralph Nader on Crime : Aug 9, 2000
Death penalty does not deter

Q: Isn’t the death penalty really a states’ rights issue?
A: Well, it used to be, but now there are numerous federal crimes which provide for the death penalty, that’s a recent development. And a president, I think, should take
a strong stand. The death penalty has been shown, in study after study, not to deter homicides; it has been