Many people confronted with a terminal illness are confused about what they can do as a dying person. This is when euthanasia is often discussed. Deciding that this is the only option is a long drawn out process. Being that a large part of American society is of Christian beliefs, it is necessary to look at morality based on religion. The main pro-suicide argument deals completely within the issue of choice. If life is seen as a covenant, or temporary loan from God, the freedom to choose how that loan is repaid should lie directly within the person contemplating euthanasia. Since life is not a gift of choice, is it just to, under Christian morality, be able to choose the details and time of his or her death? ( Rauscher 13 )
Catholic views that God is the Creator, and therefore master of our fate. Hence, if to live a life of agony and pain is your fate as deamed by God, the so a person should live his or her life as it comes and accept it. We have the use of our body while we are earthly soles, but we don\'t have absolute use of which choosing to end our lives falls. Suffering through life instills humility in man, since he sees that only God can comfort him in his time of suffering. Accepting suffering purifies man, since man relinquishes himself to the will of God.( Trubo 90 )
Trubo makes reference to one, A. T. Welford, who at the time was professor of psychology at the University of the Adelaide in Australia.

Welford stated that an amount of suffering is necessary to bringing out good in any individual. He uses the example that sheltering a child from all worry, pain, and disappointment stunts a child\'s mental and emotional development. ( 93 )

If one comes from a religiously strong background, they will find that euthanasia is to always be condemned as well as prohibited. However, if euthanasia seems to be the only choice, a person may find him or herself discarding the religous beliefs that have guided thier lives.

The key to having family be a part of a person\'s decision to euthanize, is to keep from waiting untill it is too late. As Humphry cites, a person needs to approach discussion while they\'re still healthy. Another key is to make sure that the person doesn\'t just surprise thier family by telling them that the person has already made the decision to euthanize. A person contemplating euthanasia should subtly make references to thier opinion of euthanasia. It is important to take the feedback of how a person\'s family reacts to the news of the person\'s intentions; as well, it is important to not
let family make a person\'s decisions for them.

As Maguire, on the laws pertaining to suicide and euthanasia, said: Most jurisdictions have what is known as as the "year-and-a-day rule for punishing homicides. This means that death must ensure within a year and a day from the infliction of the mortal
wound or it is concluded that death was due to other causes and the assailant escapes charges. With a respirator, a victim could be kept alive for longer than a year and a day and murder

charges would fail. ( 49 )

There is only one country which permits doctors to help patients die

legally by request. This country is the Netherlands, also known as Sweden.

Helping another person die is against the law in America. Unlike common

belief, suicide and attempted suicide are not crimes. Supplying the means

of helping someone die, such as drugs, is more than likely a crime, although

it has never actually been tried in a court of law. The actual criminal liability

falls from the actual touching of the person whom euthanasia is has been

chosen. ( Humphry 32 )

Trubo cites the double-edged sword of legally classifying euthanasia:

The Medical Society of New York State, for example, has already

declared that "every human being of adult years and sound

mind" has the right to determine what shall be done with his own

"body" after death. But there is no clear definition of when a person becomes a "body". ( 28 )

Resulting from dispute by medical authorities, a new definition centered around