"Has been a lifesaver so many times!"
- Catherine Rampell, student @ University of Washington
"Exactly the help I needed."
- Jennifer Hawes, student @ San Jose State
"The best place for brainstorming ideas."
- Michael Majchrowicz, student @ University of Kentucky
Heres the catch
I would have to say that Joseph Hellerís Catch-22, was at least enjoyable to read. There were several aspects about it that made it good and bad at the same time. First, I think the most important thing aspect to look at, is that Heller makes death, a traditionally sickening topic, a humorous event. It is humorous because of the way he illustrates who is crazy. I assumed that Yossarian was the insane one in the beginning. Now, I canít say that I am sure. I like how this book makes the reader think. Who really is crazy? Does anyone know? Yossarian is doing anything he needs to, to survive. Does that make him insane? In my eyes, he is living on instincts, the way he should. The threat of death keeps him going. He is not insane. So who is insane, the reader, the writer? I donít feel that I can answer that. If anything, I think all of the above. It is neat to see how one would act when faced with death. I think what Heller was trying to say is that when someone knows they are dying, nothing makes sense to them. When we see people that know they are dying, we think that they donít make sense. So, we canít really know who is making sense. Itís very tricky in that way. This at least kept me awake and thinking while reading it.
I think the main conflict of the story, was between humanity and the rules. We are forced to do something by law then we pay the ultimate price for it. The best part is that we do it all for the idea that we are protecting those laws. The idea of a Catch-22 is interesting. Itís like saying, ďA person has the right to do anything that another person cannot stop them from doing.Ē This catch appears throughout the entire book. It was quite evident when the Italian woman is talking about the Military Police. It is also clearly evident when Yossarian is walking down the stairs. He is cursing Catch-22, although he doesnít believe in it. There is no real explanation for Catch-22, thatís the catch. It can only be defined as Catch-22. When Yossarian discusses with Colonels Cathcart and Korn, it is easy to see the Catch-22. This situation shows that a Catch-22 causes a person to betray all the values that they have. All this time, Iíve been trying to explain what I feel about the book, when I donít know how I feel. This Catch-22 is so strange that my thoughts about it keep changing as I type, changing the way I feel about the book as a whole. Itís very odd. I liked the book, but the ideas in it are so marveling that Iím not sure what to think. How Heller wrote this impresses me. His use of the Character Yossarian causes the reader to examine oneself, and also examine the idea of insanity. Overall, Iíd have to say that this book is definitely good to read, but my feelings are still questionable. I hate to see a book such as this go to waste in the end, lie so many others. There is no reason for it to end this way. It just shows a lack of imagination. There is no sense of individuality in the books ending. IT was simply bad guy dies and loses. There is nothing that is different from any other form of book
All of the above stated things are true.
View Full Essay
Fiction, Literature, American literature, Catch-22, Yossarian, Joseph Heller, Orr, Doc Daneeka
More Free Essays Like This