On How Tragedy Leads to Deception in The Tragedy o
This essay On How Tragedy Leads to Deception in The Tragedy o has a total of 1160 words and 6 pages.
On How Tragedy Leads to Deception in The Tragedy of Hamlet Prince of Denmark
On How Tragedy Leads to Deception in: "The Tragedy of Hamlet, Prince of Denmark"
In the play "The Tragedy of Hamlet, Prince of Denmark," William Shakespeare has used the theme of deception, and how its use by one or more characters leads to their downfall. Polonius explicitly stated this theme when he said to Laertes in I, ii, "By indirections find directions out." Each major character in Hamlet, in his or her own way, provided an example of this theme. By using deceit the characters in "Hamlet" employed methods to fulfill their own agenda, an action that ultimately resulted in tragedy.
Shakespeare\'s use of deception is seen most clearly in Hamlet\'s actions. He began to "act mad" early in the play in order to manipulate his friends. "…Hereafter [I] shall… put an antic disposition on" (I.v.171-2). Hamlet swore to use this antic disposition to uncover his father\'s murderer. He used this performance as a tool of artifice in order to cover up his true feelings. Hamlet went too far however, and his underhanded plan began to work against him.
By not coming clean with those he trusts most, Hamlet served to alienate them from himself, and from his cause (of avenging his father\'s death). In III i, Hamlet said to Ophelia, "God hath given you a face, and you make [yourself] another." Prince Hamlet hypocritically attacked her for concealing her opinions, while he counterfeited his own opinions with the antic disposition. Ophelia is not the only character he acted mad toward; he used the same duplicity toward all characters in the play. When speaking to Rosencrantz and Guildenstern, for example, he asked them to "be even and direct" with him, but did not inform them of the intent behind his own deceitful actions. As shown when Rozencrantz said to Hamlet, "You… bar the door upon your own liberty, if you deny [telling] your griefs to your friend[s]" (III.ii.317-8), Hamlet had not been fully open with his friends.
Hamlet\'s use of an antic disposition is what lead to his death. He had overdone his acting mad, and the madness he had created began to control him as seen in V, ii when Hamlet speaks of himself in the third person to Laertes:
…I here proclaim [my] madness… If Hamlet from himself be ta\'en away, / And when he\'s not himself, does wrong Laertes, / Then hamlet does it not, Hamlet denies it: / Who does it then? His madness. If\'t be so, / Hamlet is of the faction that is wronged, / His madness is poor Hamlet\'s enemy." (Lines 213-22)
Hamlet\'s acting mad swelled to such a level that he could not claim responsibility for the offenses that he committed. His loss of control is a crucial aspect of the play\'s theme, because it shows Hamlet\'s deterioration by the same actions he had previously preformed in order to mask his true outlook.
Claudius is another character in "Hamlet" who used treachery to reach his objective. Everything he tried to accomplish he did in a sly manner, beginning with the killing of his brother. The ghost of the king saw Claudius as a man, "…[ who has] the power… to seduce… my most virtuous queen." He killed the king not by confrontation, but with a "leprous distilment" poured slowly and quietly into his ear. The sly manner in which he did this is what spurred Hamlet to seek revenge. Claudius, while praying, admitted to himself that he could not repent for what he had done: "Yet what can it, when one cannot repent?" (III.iii.66). He knew what he did was wrong, and that it would come to haunt him in the form of the tragic loss of his life.
Through underhanded means King Claudius tried to kill Hamlet several times. The first of which he used Rosencrantz and Guildenstern as guardians accompanying Hamlet to England,
I like him not, nor stands it safe with us / To let his madness rage. Therefore prepare you, / I your commission will forthwith dispatch, / And he to England shall along with you: / The terms of our estate may not endure / Hazard so near\'s as doth hourly grow / Out of his brows" (III.iii.1-7).
The king recognized his nephew\'s
Topics Related to On How Tragedy Leads to Deception in The Tragedy o
English-language films, Characters in Hamlet, British films, Prince Hamlet, Hamlet, Laertes, Polonius, Tragedy, King Claudius, Ophelia
Essays Related to On How Tragedy Leads to Deception in The Tragedy o
Film NoirFilm Noir Forty years after Raymond Borde and Étienne Chaumeton defined the challenge, critical commentators on film noir continue to grapple with it. Ironically, American writers did not immediately take up consideration of this indigenous phenomenon and the question of its essential traits. Only gradually in a frequently cross-referenced series of essays in the 1970s did they begin to express themselves. There are now a dozen full-length books in English concerning film noir and undoubtedly
Dominican music and film Dominican music and film The Caribbean island nation of the Dominican Republic is little known by most Americans, but America is ever present in the Dominican consciousness. Until Sammy Sosa and Mark McGuire went head to head in the legendary homerun battle of 1998, few Americans were aware of any American-Dominican rivalry in western hemispheric culture. Nothing gave Dominicans more pride than to see Sosa hold Major League Baseballs homerun record, albeit for less than 24 hours before McGuire
AmericanizationAmericanization Former Canadian Prime Minister Pierre Trudeau once compared liking next to the United States to sleeping with an elephant. He said, â€˜You cannot help but be aware of its every movement.\' http://www.pbs.org/pioneerliving/segments/Americanization.htm The issue of American culture and its globalization has raised a lot of controversy. The era of globalization is becoming the preferred term to describe the current times. The term Americanization has been around for years. It wa
AmericanizationAmericanization If you ask me to name the proudest distinction of Americans, I would choose- because it contains all the others- the fact that they were the people who created the phrase to make money. No other language or nation had ever used these words before; men had always thought of wealth as a static quantity- to be seized, begged, inherited, shared, looted or obtained as a favor. Americans were the first to understand that wealth has to be created. Ayn Rand People have always been inte